Reports Home

Health Fitness and Wellbeing Seminar Results

   

1. BSC

 

John Miller conducted a Musculo-skeletal Health seminar for The Group in October 2007.

 

188 participants completed the following profiles: -

 

Health, Fitness and Wellbeing

 

Musculo-skeletal risk

 

The results are presented in graphic format, with commentary.

 

MIND AND BODY PROFILE

The Mind and Body profile provides people with a very good idea of how well the various systems of the body are functioning, particularly the

 

•      the mind

•      autonomic nervous system

•      immune system

•      digestive system

•      circulatory system

•      elimination system

•      musculo-skeletal system.

 

 

 

Symptom

None

Not much

A fair bit

A lot

 
 

1.

Headaches

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

2.

Migraines

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

3.

Lack of energy and vitality

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

4.

Candida - jock itch, thrush, tinea ...

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

5.

Poor sleep. If on tablets score 10

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

6.

Snoring &/or sleep apnoea.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

7.

Crook back, sore shoulders RSI ...

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

8.

Frequent colds, flu, sinus

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

9.

Unsettled stomach, reflux

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

10.

Irritable bowel, constipation, trots ...

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

11.

Overweight - 1 point for every 2Kg

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

12.

Asthma

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

13.

Low level of aerobic fitness

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

14.

Chest pain, palpitations

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

15.

Rashes, itchiness, psoriasis, zits

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

16.

Mouth ulcers, cold sores

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

17.

Elevated blood pressure. Score 0 on pills

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

18.

Reduced libido

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

19.

Shakes, nervous ticks, mannerisms

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

20.

Grinding teeth

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

21.

Alcoholic drinks per day (2 pts/drink)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

22.

Smoking. (1 pt/cigarette/day)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

23.

Caffeine (1 pt/cup per day)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

24.

Anxious about life in general

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

25.

Insecure/apprehensive about the future

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

26.

Sad or depressed (On medication, score 0)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

27.

In wrong job for now

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

28.

Under-appreciated at work

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

29.

Under-appreciated at home

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 
 

30.

Unhappy with family and romantic life

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 

  Score

   

 

The score of a normal, fit and healthy human being is less than 20     

 

Higher scores are symptomatic of dysfunction of one or more body systems.

 

People with low levels of fitness and high levels of stress usually score well over 100.

 

For people with a score of more than 80, the ‘background noise’ of their life is becoming louder and louder. It is hard to concentrate on your work when body systems are dysfunctional.

 

We know a fit and healthy group when we see the majority of scores below 40. This was not the case with this group. By and large higher scores are usually a reflection of

 

•      low levels of fitness

•      an inability to deal with what life and work are serving up to people.

 

Remember, it is not what happens, but how we deal with what happens that determines our level of stress. 

 

Classification of average scores: Excellent - less than 40. Good - 41 - 50. Reasonable 51-60. Poor - over 60.

 

This profile is described as poor. The average score was 67. Anyone scoring more than 80 is putting up with a lot of 'background noise'.

 

HEALTH CLIMATE SURVEY

Based on scores received in the Wellbeing profile we've compiled a Health Climate Survey. Scores on each item have ranked - the higher the score the worse the problem. We added the scores for each item. The results appear in the table below.

 

 

Symptoms/issues/concerns

% of people

scoring over 5

 

Low level of fitness

55  

Musculo-skeletal dysfunction

43  

Overweight

42  

Poor sleep

36  

Lack of energy

35  

Snoring

34  

Alcohol

32  

Libido

24  

Anxious

24  

Smoking

23  

Headaches

20  

Crook gut

20  

Insecure

18  

Wrong job

18  

Caffeine

16  

Colds and flu

15  

Blood pressure

15  

Depressed

15  

Irritable bowel

14  

Grinding teeth

13  

Asthma

10  

Chest pain

10  

Rashes

10  

Migraines

7  

Candida

7  

Shakes

6  

Mouth ulcers

4  

Unhappy family

2  

Under appreciated at home

1  

Under appreciated at work

1  

 

15 people were on blood pressure medication.

 

6 people were on anti-depressant medication.

 

The highlight of the results was the fact that just about everybody felt appreciated at work.

 

Our recommendation is that the organisation focus on improving scores on the items highlighted.

 

MUSCULO-SKELETAL RISK FACTOR

Our musculo-skeletal risk factor profile looked at a range of parameters including mobility, strength and flexibility and whether people are training to keep themselves strong and flexible.

 

The musculo-skeletal risk factor profile is comprised of a mix of 9 objective and 3 subjective assessments.

•      Current musculo-skeletal condition

•      Age

•      Closeness to ideal weight

•      Abdominal strength test

•      Upper body strength test

•      Flexibility

•      Functional mobility – the ability to sit down and stand up with ease.

•      Shoulder function

•      Dominant hand grip

•      Non-dominant hand grip

 

A score of 70% is attainable by those who have a regular and systematic training program.

 

Those scoring less than 70 are not doing sufficient in the way of strength and flexibility exercises. They are therefore exposing themselves to a high risk of musculo-skeletal dysfunction. (It would be bizarre for a workplace to offer to pay the rehabilitation costs of people who were not keeping themselves strong enough or flexible enough to do their job without succumbing to musculo-skeletal dysfunction, wouldn't it?)

 

   
 

Not a particularly good result. Over 40% of people are experiencing pain and discomfort. In a corporate setting we'd recommend that those scoring less the 6 need to be required attend a prehab/rehab program, for their own benefit and that of the organisation.

  As a group this is a poor result. 17 sit-ups (7/10) was the pass mark. People who can't do 17 sit-ups in 30 seconds aren't serious about protecting their trunk from dysfunction. Strong stomach muscles are a foundation of good musculo-skeletal health. The abdominal muscles play a key role in lifting.
   
 

A better result than abdominal strength. However, 50% were not good at pressups. 17 press-ups (7/10) was the pass mark. People who can't do 17 press-ups in 30 seconds aren't serious about protecting the arms and shoulders from dysfunction.

  A poor result overall. Nearly 30% of people couldn't reach down to touch their toes. This lack of flexibility in calf, hamstring, buttock and back muscles is setting them up for musculo-skeletal dysfunction.
   
  This is a good result. However, when you can't get down and up off the floor 7 times in 30 seconds you've got a mobility problem. Fix it!   This is good result. Those scoring less than 10 were few in number and their shoulder function certainly redeemable.
   
  A good result. I strongly recommend people use the grip strengtheners every day to improve grip strength.   Another good result. I strongly recommend people use the grip strengtheners every day to improve grip strength. It's hard to blame the mouse and the keyboard when you're lacking in grip strength!
   

Its always the case, few people have a regular strength and flexibility program. The group needs to put in train a regular and systematic training program, on site, that includes

 

1.  specialist prehab and rehab sessions for those at serious risk and those already dysfunctional and on compo

 

2.  daily strength and flexibility sessions in the workplace for everyone.

   

Average score: 56. Not particularly good. This graph show why people are experiencing pain. 65% of people are not in doing the things they need to do to keep their musculo-skeletal system in good shape. There is a strong case of the group to implement an obligatory strength and flexibility program for those who scored less than 60 in this profile.

 

We recommend the Organisation take seriously and monitor carefully the incidence of musculo-skeletal dysfunction and put in place an organisation-wide strategy to improve strength, flexibility and mobility. By far and away a high proportion of people do not have a strength and flexibility program. As a result they are getting weaker and tighter by the week, thereby exposing themselves and the organisation to risk.

 

When push comes to shove and people become dysfunctional, it will be the Organisation that ends up paying the high cost of an avoidable musculo-skeletal complaint.

 

In our opinion musculo-skeletal dysfunction caused by lack of a regular and systematic strength and flexibility program cannot be classified as an injury. Responsibility for musculo-skeletal dysfunction needs to be sheeted home to individual employees, though it’s unlikely to happen without the establishment of a culture within the Organisation that supports, values and understands strength and flexibility.

 

We recommend a range of strength and flexibility classes that are readily available

Australia-wide: -

 

•

Posture and Flexibility

•

Yoga

•

Crookback Clinic

•

Tai Chi

•

Pontius Pilates

 

The Organisation would place itself in the forefront of OH&S practice if it took the musculo-skeletal risk seriously and moved heaven and earth to educate all staff about this risk and encourage them to take part in a regular strength and flexibility program. Maybe The Organisation and its worker's compensation insurer could invest in a pilot program to increase staff strength and flexibility!

 

The lack of strength and flexibility training coupled with poor abdominal strength, upper body strength, flexibility and shoulder function is a cause for concern and needs the attention of individual staff and managers.  

RECOMMENDATION

We strongly recommend that the people who are in current poor musculo-skeletal condition, and who lack abdominal strength, upper body strength, flexibility, shoulder function and functional mobility, in particular those who scored less than 50 on the profile, be obligated to attend regular, in-house strength and flexibility classes.

The pressure on the organisation's workers' compensation costs is such that to do otherwise would, in our opinion be to abrogate a responsibility for the prudent management of the organisation's finances.

 

 

 

 

Miller Health

In association with Integrated Health Systems

7 Salvado Place Stirling ACT 2611

(02) 6288 7703